Frank, R., Bernanke, B., Antonovics, K., & Heffetz, O. . (2024).
Principles of Macroeconomics. McGraw Hill. Retrieved from
Publisher's VersionEmbark on an exploration of macroeconomics with its 2024 release, unfolding against the backdrop of unprecedented economic transformations. As the world grapples with challenges, this product’s focused approach equips you to decipher the complexities of macroeconomics in a rapidly evolving environment. This product’s philosophy stands strong: strip away the unnecessary and intensify focus on central concepts. Our goal is to produce macroeconomic naturalists who see each economic event because of a cost-benefit calculation. From understanding the reasons behind holding U.S. dollars to unraveling the impact of inflation, this textbook actively engages students, making macroeconomics a language they speak fluently. With heavy emphasis on globalization, this text navigates real wage inequality, costs and benefits of trade, protectionism, and the link between exchange rates and monetary policy. Frank, Nobel-Prize winner: Bernanke, Antonovics, and Heffetz bring expertise to every chapter keeping the learning fresh, engaging, and always up-to-date.
Karlinsky, A. . (2024).
International Completeness of Death Registration. Retrieved from
Publisher's VersionAbstract
BACKGROUND
Death registration completeness, the share of deaths captured by countries’ vital registration systems, vary substantially across countries. Estimates of completeness, even recent ones, are outdated or contradictory for many countries.
OBJECTIVE
We derive the most up-to-date and consistent estimates of death registration completeness in as many countries as possible.
RESULTS
Death registration is complete in Europe, North America, and other developed countries. In developing countries, completeness varies by region. While some have complete death registration, many countries completeness ranges from 40% to 75%. Regionally, Africa has lowest death registration completeness, and in many countries no registration data was located. In Latin America and Asia, several countries have improved their registration compared to previously available estimates.
CONTRIBUTION
This paper presents the publicly available International Completeness of Death Registration (ICDR) dataset: https://github.com/akarlinsky/death registration ICDR contains the annual amount of deaths registered and death registration completeness in 193 countries from 2015 to 2019.
Karlinsky, A., & Shayo, M. . (2024).
On the Manipulation of Information by Governments
. Retrieved from
Publisher's VersionAbstractGovernmental information manipulation has been hard to measure and study systematically. We hand-collect data from official and unofficial sources in 134 countries to estimate misreporting of Covid mortality during 2020-21. We find that between 45%–55% of governments misreported the number of deaths. The lion's share of misreporting cannot be attributed to a country's capacity to accurately diagnose and report deaths. Contrary to some theoretical expectations, there is little evidence of governments exaggerating the severity of the pandemic. Misreporting is higher where governments face few social and institutional constraints, in countries holding elections, and in countries with a communist legacy.
Dorfman, A., & Harel, A. . (2024).
Reclaiming the Public. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
Publisher's VersionReclaiming the Public defines and defends the intrinsic value of “the public” that resides in our public institutions and the officials that run them. The book argues that public institutions do not simply act for us but instead speak and act in our name; i.e., they represent us. Representation requires that decisions made by public institutions or officials are consistent with the perspectives of citizens. If the decisions satisfy this requirement, these decisions are attributable to citizens, and citizens can be held responsible for them. This theory of political authority accounts for major features of our legal system, such as the non-instrumental grounds for the separation of law-making powers, the non-instrumental value of constitutions, the limits of privatization, the nature and value of public property, and the impermissibility of using artificial intelligence in setting certain policies and making certain decisions.