@booklet {bar-hillel-acomrtuamotcb2010,
	title = {A Commentary on Mel Rutherford{\textquoteright}S {\textquoteright}On the Use and Misuse of the "Two Children Brainteaser{\textquoteright}},
	howpublished = {Discussion Papers},
	year = {2010},
	month = {5},
	publisher = {Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2010)},
	abstract = {Rutherford (2010) criticizes the way some people have analyzed the 2-children problem, claiming (correctly) that slight nuances in the problem{\textquoteright}s formulation can change the correct answer. However, his own data demonstrate that even when there is a unique correct answer, participants give intuitive answers that differ from it systematically {\textendash} replicating the data reported by those he criticizes. Thus, his critique reduces to an admonition to use care in formulating and analyzing this brainteaser {\textendash} which is always a good idea {\textendash} but contributes little to what is known, analytically or empirically, about the 2-children problem.},
	url = {/files/dp551.pdf},
	author = {Bar-Hillel, Maya}
}
