Might vs. morality in majority-minority relations in Israel: some insights from ultimatum experiments

The ultimatum game depicts an interactive situation in which two players have different modalities of control over a shared resource. While one player, the proposer, has an exclusive entitlement to propose an allocation, a second player, the responder, has an exclusive entitlement to veto a proposed allocation. Results from ultimatum bargaining experiments will be utilized to speculate on the roles of might and morality in interactive situations characterized by power asymmetry.

Emotions, Trust, and Advice Taking

In this talk, I will describe how emotions influence trust and advice taking. I will focus on incidental emotions, emotions triggered by a prior experience that is irrelevant to the current situation. I will describe results from experiments that show that people who feel incidental gratitude are more trusting and more receptive to advice than are people in a neutral emotional state, and that people in a neutral state are more trusting and more receptive to advice than are people who feel incidental anger.

Man vs. Machine in Chess: An Account by a Computer Chess World Champion

Programming a computer to defeat the best human chess players is one of the classical problems of AI and computer science. Turing and Shannon laid out the foundations, and hundreds of researchers and mavericks put their best efforts into it. I will discuss the ups and downs of the challenge, David Levy's bet, Kasparov's matches against Deep Blue and Deep Junior, and the computer chess world championships.

The Talmud On Transitivity (joint work with Shlomo Naeh)

Transitivity is a fundamental axiom in Economics that appears in consumer theory, decision under uncertainty, and social choice theory.While the appeal of transitivity is obvious, observed choices sometimes contradict it.This paper shows that treatments of violations of transitivity already appear in the rabbinical literature, starting with the Mishnah and the Talmud (1st-5th c CE). This literature offers several solutionsthat are similar to those used in the modern economic literature, as well as some other solutions that may be adopted in modern situations.We analyze several examples.

Benefits of Matchmaking

In the modern society norms towards relationships have changed significantly. In the past, a relationship once formed was expected to last. Nowadays, getting out of a relationship is not restricted by norms.Our model shows how value and a role of matchmaking changed with the changes in society. Using examples of online dating sites, we show that by imposing high cost on participants a matchmaker can provide matches yielding higher expected payoff than the general market. This is true even when the matchmaker has no specific information about the individuals.

Why we view the brain as computer

Computational neuroscientists employ computer models and simulations in studying brain functions. But, in addition, they view the modeled nervous system itself as computing. What does it mean to say that the brain computes? And what is the utility of the 'brain-as-computer' assumption in studying brain functions? In previous work, I argue that the algorithmic conception of computation is not adequate to address these questions. Here I introduce and explicate an alternative, "analog", conception of computation. The term 'analog' does not mean continuous, non-discrete or non-digital.

Endogenous Market Power

In this paper we develop a framework to study thin markets, in which all traders, buyers and sellers are large, in the sense that they all have market power (also known as bilateral oligopoly). Unlike the standard IO models our framework does not a priori assume that some traders do or do not have market power because they are large or small. Here, market power arises endogenously for each trader from market clearing and optimization by all agents. This framework allows for multiple goods and heterogeneous traders.

An Evolutionary Foundation of Rational Choice (JOINT WORK WITH CHRISTOPH KUZMICS)

A choice rule maps subsets of available alternatives to subsets of chosen alternatives. It is strictly rational if it is induced by a strict order on the grand set of alternatives. We compare intergenerational learning processes based on the distribution of choice rules a generation experiments with.


Subscribe to The Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Center for the Study of Rationality RSS